Most Active Stories
- [Slideshow: Afternoon Photos Added] Early Morning Fire on Murray Court Square
- Sixth-Grader's Science Fair Finding Shocks Ecologists
- DOE Awards Fluor $420M Contract for Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant Decommission and Decontamination
- Murray Downtown Disasters: How the City’s Handling Collapsing, Burned Buildings
- MSU Professor Gives Context to Central American Refugee Crisis
-Government & Politics - WKMS
Tue December 13, 2011
JCPS Board Delays Student Assignment Vote
The Jefferson County Board of Education has been presented a new student assignment plan after months of anticipation, but the board has delayed any decisions about implementing the plan until next month.
The new plan was proposed to the board at Monday night’s board meeting. The proposal maintains the current six clusters and boundaries the district uses to measure diversity, but includes new diversity criteria recommended by UCLA professor Gary Orfield, who provided the district with ideas in September.
The plan organizes the 570 census block groups into a Category 1, Category 2 or Category 3 based on income, race and education level. The plan says no cluster can have a majority of students from Category 1, which represents the lowest of the criteria. The plan also includes English as a Second Language (ESL) students in its diversity count, which would be new to the district.
These changes allow JCPS to identify 2,000 students whose transportation times can be shortened, said Jack Jacobs, JCPS student assignment lead.
“We would identify these particular kids and if a student and a family would like to be closer to home and it doesn’t negatively affect the diversity index then we would counsel with that family and work with them,” he said.
JCPS has already identified students who would receive a post card offering the opportunity to attend a school closer to their home pending a school’s capacity, said Jacobs.
If the board approves the plan in January it will “most definitely” give the district enough time to implement the plan next school year, he said.
But the plan “doesn’t have an equal impact for everybody,” said board member Debbie Wesslund who represents an area that has some of the district’s longest transportation times.
“I don’t want it (the plan) to be the final answer,” she said.